*************************************************************
	  *************************************************************
	  ************                                      ***********
	  ************     Somehow we should... Web 2.0     ***********
	  ************        by Second Part To Hell        ***********
	  ************                                      ***********
	  *************************************************************
	  *************************************************************


  Index:
  ******

  1) Introduction

  2) Community Project or "Use the power of Web 2.0"

  3) How should it work?





  1) Introduction

     What are successful projects? Mozilla Firefox and Wikipedia,for example.
     Why  are they successful and what  is the connection between them?  Many
     people work together, many brains think together with one goal: Increase
     the complexity and quality of the project.

     For about 20 years computervirus-authors  have formed groups and "worked
     together". Eeeehhhmmm... Did they really work together?

     In most groups there are people  who help each other and try to increase
     the reputation of the group. But still, they work as individual fighter.

     As we could see,  the concept of viruswriting groups has died because of
     natural  selection.  29A and  older  groups  died because  of  senility,
     rRlf has commited suicide  (cooler way to disappear :D),  no new serious
     groups has developed.

     Furthermore, groups are still somehow elite-like. The members will vote,
     if somebody wants to join.  If there are no people who are "good enough"
     (view of the members), no new people will join anymore.

     Resume 1: The concept "groups" is not up-to-date.

     But what else? Let's focus again on "working together".
     Successful  projects as  Firefox or  Wikipedia have  an  other  concept:
     There  are   no  individual fighters,   but a community;  there  are  no
     one-man-codes but one big project.

     Let's think about the amount of quality and complexity:
     One-Man-Codes or Community-Project? I guess you got the point...





  2) Community Project or "Use the power of Web 2.0"

     What is our main goal? A super-virus, which contains all techniques ever
     ideat, ever created! Uhhmm... YES!

     Why  didn't we  reached that goal,  yet? Because most  viruses have been
     created by a single person.

     Let's imagine:
     We have  a  wiki-platform,   which  contains  a  simple structed  virus.
     Interested people can join the wiki. In the discussion-page people think
     about  how  to improve  the  infection technique,  how  to  improve  the
     morphism, how to increase the amount of victim-files, ect...

     Some  people  create  a  new  infection  technique,  other  improve  the
     morphism.  They compain  the  different techniques to one virus.  People
     search for bugs, fix them. People build in multiplattform, ectect.

     Because of different experience, different ideas, different thinking and
     knowlegde,  people have  different  special fields.  In  this  community
     project many special fields will be compained to one single super virus.

     Resume 2: The concept "community project" is up-to-date.





  3) How should it work?

     -> One person HAS TO start the project: Creating the wiki.
     -> A crowd should has to discuss about the principal of the virus:
        language;  how the code should look like  (it will increase alot,  so
        the concept is important; maybe use the concept of already successful
        projects as Mozilla, ...)
     -> The body of the virus has to be coded and uploaded to the wiki.
     -> Many people should be invited to join coding on the project.

     Now the project is ready to start...

     -> People code new functions of the virus, upload it to the wiki.
     -> People discuss about the code.  If it's an increase of quality and/or
        complexity, the new part should be included to the virus.

     -> People improve functions of the main virus.
     -> People discuss about the  improved code.  If it's good,  the new code
        should replace the old code.

     Resume 3: The project will succeed!



                                                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                                                    Second Part To Hell
                                                    www.spth.de.vu

                                                    written in February 2008
                                                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - -